June 30, 2008 journal, the Cheney Gang planned it all in the 1990s and made it happen. The list of conspirators include Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Bill Bennett, William Kristol, Robert Kagan, Gary Smilt, John Bolton & others making plans in the 1990's for a catastrophic event to condition the American people to accept this bloody world war, these men made up the B*us*h administration from beginning to end. Go here for the Cheney gang & their planned nine1*1, the characters, project Restoring America's Defenses, the new American century manifesto from Cheney's Hunting Lodge in Wyoming. Activities from 1992 until they got their man elected in 2000, the axis of evil. http://www.prisonplanet.com/analysis_louise_010603_pnac.html The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was an American neoconservative think tank based in Washington, D.C., co-founded as "a non-profit (secret) educational organization" by William Kristol and Robert Kagan in early 1997. The PNAC's stated goal is "to promote American global leadership."[1] Fundamental to the PNAC are the views that "American leadership is both good for America and good for the world" and support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity." [2] It has exerted strong influence on high-level U.S. government officials in the administration of the U.S. President George w. B*us*h and strongly affected the George B*us*h administration's development of military & foreign policies, especially involving national security and the Iraq War.[3][4][5] As of May 20, 2008, The Project for the New American Century website was inoperable. A message saying that the account has been suspended and to contact the billing department was put on the site's page." http://cryptome.org/rad.htm If anyone has copied the Cheney gangs manifesto I would appreciate getting a copy of it. The Cheney gang, all but Cheney, signed their manifesto calling for a catastrophic event. So far I have not been able to find their manifesto but I have read it earlier. Now it has disappear from the Internet as so many things have as they clean up their track record. This a sad day for me to remember the 20th anniversary of our freedom from Commerce. An important support article http://www.rense.com/general41/role.htm "For the first time, a prominent British political figure has aired his suspicions, that the group around U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney may have intentionally caused, or allowed to happen, the mega-terrorism in New York and Washington on Sept. 1*1, 2001, to set into motion an era of neo-imperial wars. Labour Party Member of Parliament Michael Meacher wrote a major feature focusing on Dick Cheney's Project for a New American Century grouping, in the London Guardian on Sept. 6. Meacher had resigned in June as Environment Minister, a post he held in Tony Blair's government for about 6 years. This Summer's political wars in Britain, as EIR forecast they would, are drawing ever closer to Cheney. This is the context in which Mich Meacher took Blair to task for subordinating Britain's interests to Cheney and his neo-conservative gang in Washington, D.C. (Until you figure out that the United States attacked itself on that September morning) Ever since Lyndon LaRouche first affirmed early in the morning of 9-1-1, that the attacks were an "inside job", it has been taboo in Britain to publicly discuss even this possibility, especially as Blair's Britain joined in the neo-conservatives' wars against Afghanistan and Iraq, becoming the Cheney-acs' main prop overseas. And although Meacher's polemic narrows the motive of Cheney et al. to an oil grab, his intervention is timely. "(You will not be able to put the other pieces of the puzzle together.) On Sept. 7, just ahead of the second anniversary of 91*1, London was the scene of huge "anti-terror exercises," including contingency plans for the mass evacuation of the city. During that week, there was heavy police presence and Londoners were very nervous. One European strategist warned EIR Sept. 9, that London is the most likely target for a new act of mega-terrorism. But a London insider cautioned EIR, on the same day, that Blair and his minions are determined to stoke alarm, to "justify" his war policies and to divert attention from his political woes. Those woes are bound to get worse. The Lord Hutton inquiry into the July 17 death of weapons expert Dr. David Kelly had produced startling revelations by Sept. 8, blowing apart the case Blair made last year for war against Iraq. One informed source affirmed Sept. 8: "This is only the beginning, and when the inquiry resumes next Monday [Sept. 15], things are going to get a lot tougher, when the process of cross-examining leading officials begins." (I say it was carried out by America, Israel with the help of Dubai.) Other Laborites are joining the attack on Blair, including former International Development Secretary Clare Short, and former Leader of the House of Commons and former Foreign Secretary Robin Cook. On Sept. 8, Cook drew gasps from MPs, when he blasted Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon for having ignored the reservations of his own Defense Intelligence Staff (DIS), about the fraudulent September 2002 dossier on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction (WMD) issued by Blair's 10 Downing Street. Hoon was then jeered, when he tried to pass off responsibility for the dossier to Britain's Joint Intelligence Committee (JIC). The next day, it was revealed that Hoon had given misleading evidence to the House of Commons Intelligence and Security Committee investigating the dossier in July, flatly denying that DIS experts had expressed such concerns. It is widely assumed that Hoon will soon bite the dust, closely following the Aug. 29 resignation of Downing Street chief spin doctor Alastair Campbell. (It is all a constant spin job) (Sure they use some Saudi Arabian Arabs on board to authenticate it) On Sept. 8, Foreign Secretary Jack Straw came into the Hutton inquiry fire, as documents were released, showing his role in bringing Kelly's name into the public light, as the source for a BBC report that intelligence experts had regarded the September 2002 dossier as "sexed up." Kelly's death followed shortly after his name was made public. It also came out that Hoon had played a role in "sexing up" that dossier, and urging that references to Iraqi WMDs be strengthened and demanding a "killer paragraph" to make the case against Iraq stronger. A U.K. intelligence expert told EIR Sept. 8, that these eruptions are creating a fertile environment, in which the issues Meacher has raised can now be "openly debated and considered.... The Hutton inquiry, and other factors, have raised enormous questions about why Tony Blair, in reality, wanted this Iraqi weapons behind dossier, and that, in turn, is focusing attention on the motives of the administration in Washington, in starting the war in Iraq." (62,000 jobs lost in the United States in June, gas $4.10 oil 148.) (The Cheney gang's original manifesto is missing now from the Internet obviously) This bad news for Blair in Britain bodes ill for Cheney and Co., and all sorts of surprises may emerge. How nervous certain people are, is becoming clear from the wild attacks on Meacher's article: by the American Embassy in London; by Lord Conrad Black's Sunday Telegraph; and by Rupert Murdoch's Times. (Sounds like the same Old egg suckers) (I read it but failed to copy it but if anybody did please send in a copy because) 'The Truth May Be a Great Deal Murkier' (Article mentions Pearl Harbor catastrophe). (it names the names and states the purpose so clearly the need for another Pearl Harbor) Meacher's Guardian article was entitled, "This War on Terrorism Is Bogus," with the sub-title, "The nine/1*1 attacks gave the U.S. an ideal pretext to use force to secure its global domination." He began, that whereas "massive attention" has been paid to Britain's excuse for going to war, "far too little attention has focused on why the U.S. went to war; and that throws light on British motives too. (Here is the phony prepaid coalition.) (Even though it be written in stone many will still believe the Arabs attacked us.) "The conventional explanation is that after the Twin Towers were hit, retaliation against al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan was a natural first step in launching a global war against terrorism. Then, because Saddam Hussein was alleged by the U.S. & U.K. governments to retain weapons of mass destruction, the war could be extended to Iraq as well. However this theory does not fit all the facts. The truth may be a great deal murkier." (These are the designers of our destruction and they are all demonically lead and fed) He went on: "We now know that a blueprint for the creation of a global Pax Americana was drawn up for Dick Cheney (now Vice President), Donald Rumsfeld (Defense Secretary), Paul Wolfowitz (Rumsfeld's deputy), Jeb Bxush (George B*us*h's younger brother) and Lewis Libby (Cheney's chief of staff). The document, entitled 'Rebuilding America's Defenses,' was written in September 2000 by the neo-conservative think-tank, Project for the New American Century (PNAC). (Satan manifested is our real enemy) (Most likely nothing will stop the attack on Iran by either the U.S. or Israel now.) "The plan shows B*us*h's cabinet intended to take military control of the Gulf region whether or not Saddam Hussein was in power. It says 'while the unresolved conflict with Iraq provides the immediate justification, the need for a substantial American force presence in the Persian Gulf transcends the issue of the regime of Saddam Hussein.' " (This is so simple that most fifth graders could understand it if they have an open mind.) Meacher noted that the PNAC blueprint supported an earlier document attributed to Wolfowitz and Libby which said the United States must "discourage advanced industrial nations from challenging our leadership or even aspiring to a larger regional or global role." This early-1990s "Pentagon Guidance Document," a.k.a. "the Wolfowitz doctrine," prescribes pre-emptive military action, and implicitly, pre-emptive nuclear strikes, against potential challenges to an American or Anglo-American empire. (Do not expect these policies to suddenly end because we are under control.) Cheney, then Defense Secretary in President H.W. B*u*s*h's Administration, supported this outrage, which was nixed then by senior Administration figures, including the Presid-*ent. With B*us*h Jr., the policy has been implemented. (I would not be surprised to see this president extend himself for the good of the people) In detailing the September 2000 PNAC blueprint, Meacher noted that it refers to allies such as the U.K., as "the most effective and efficient means of exercising American global leadership." Further, the blueprint also calls for "regime change" in China, and advocates imperial control of space and cyberspace, and development of new biological weapons. "Finally written a year before 9*1*1 and it pinpoints North Korea, Syria and Iran as dangerous regimes, and says their existence justifies the creation of a 'worldwide command and control system.' This is a blueprint for U.S. world domination. But before it is dismissed as an agenda for rightwing fantasists, it is clear it provides a much better explanation of what actually happened before, during and after 9*1*1 than the global war on terrorism thesis. This can be seen in several ways." (the profitable wars) (for the good of the American people even though none of it is for the good of the people) Why Did U.S. Air Air Force Security Stand Down? (on the morning of the great attack) (I never dreamed that Armageddon would be originated in America.) Meacher next presented his views, of what happened two years ago; EIR finds them worth reporting, including his attributed sources: "First, it is clear the U.S. authorities did little or nothing to pre-empt the events of 9*1*1. It is known that at least 11 countries provided advance warning to the U.S. of the 9*1*1 attacks. Two senior Mossad experts were sent to Washington in August 2001 to alert the CIA and FBI to a cell of 200 terror-ists said to be preparing a big operation (Daily Telegraph, Sept. 16, 2001). The list they provided included the names of 4 of the 9*1*1 hijackers, none of whom was arrested. (but you see the devil is the same universally and has one thing in mind-destruction) "It had been known as early as 1996 that there were plans to hit Washington targets with aeroplanes. Then in 1999 a U.S. national intelligence council report noted that 'al-Qaeda suicide bombers could crash-land an aircraft packed with high explosives into the Pentagon, the headquarters of the CIA, or the Wh*ite Ho*use.' (Until God brings it down it will continue to be deadly for all people) "Fifteen of the 9*1*1 hijackers obtained their visas in Saudi Arabia. Michael Springman, the former head of the American visa bureau in Jeddah, has stated that since 1987 the CIA had been illicitly issuing visas to unqualified applicants from the Middle East and bringing them to the U.S. for training in terrorism for the Afghan war in collaboration with bin Laden (BBC, Nov. 6 2001). It seems this operation continued after the Afghan war for other purposes. It is also reported that five of the hijackers received training at secure U.S. military installations in the 1990s (Newsweek, Sept. 15, 2001). (death of the dollar will end the wars then all lies will be shouted from the house top) "Instructive leads prior to 9*1*1 were not followed up. French Moroccan flight student Zacarias Moussaoui (now thought to be the 20th hijacker) was arrested in August 2001 after an instructor reported he showed a suspicious interest in learning how to steer large airliners. When U.S. agents learned from French intelligence he had radical Islamist ties, they sought a warrant to search his computer, which contained clues to the Sept. 1*1 mission (Times, Nov. 3, 2001). But they were turned down by the FBI. One agent wrote, a month before 9*1*1, that Moussaoui might be planning to crash into the Twin Towers (Newsweek, May 20, 2002). (Moussaoui was not the mastermind) "All of this makes it all the more astonishing on the war on terrorism perspective that there was such slow reaction on Sept. 1*1 itself. "The first hijacking was suspected at not later than 8:20 a.m., and the last hijacked aircraft crashed in Pennsylvania at 10:06 a.m. Not a single fighter plane was scrambled to investigate from the U.S. Andrews Air Force Base, just 10 miles from Washington, D.C., until after the third plane had hit the (if it did) Pentagon at 9:38 a.m. Why not? ... Between September 2000 and June 2001 the U.S. military launched fighter aircraft on 67 occasions to chase suspicious aircraft (AP, Aug. 13, 2002). It is a U.S. legal requirement that once an aircraft has moved significantly off its flight plan, fighter planes are sent up to investigate. (But no plane hit the Pentagon) (If you need the true church is in the hearts of the people.) "Was this inaction simply the result of key people disregarding, or being ignorant of, the evidence? Or could U.S. air security operations have been deliberately stood down on Sept. 1*1? If so, why, and on whose authority?" Meacher affirmed that "the catalogue of evidence does, however, fall into place when set against the PNAC blueprint. From this it seems that the so-called 'war on terrorism' is being used largely as bogus cover for achieving wider U.S. strategic geopolitical objectives. Indeed Tony Blair himself hinted at this when he said to the Commons liaison committee: 'To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent to have suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on Sept. 1*1" (Times, July 17, 2002). Similarly Rumsfeld was so determined to obtain a rationale for an attack on Iraq that on 10 separate occasions he asked the CIA to find evidence linking Iraq to 9*1*1; the CIA repeatedly came back empty-handed (Time magazine, May 13, 2002). (Destruction to our way of life is coming soon as predicted in Revelation) "In fact, 9*1*1 offered an extremely convenient pretext to put the PNAC plan into action. The evidence again is quite clear that plans for military action against Afghanistan and Iraq were in hand well before 9*1*1. A report prepared for the U.S. government from the Baker Institute of Public Policy stated in April 2001 that 'the U.S. remains a prisoner of its energy dilemma. Iraq remains a destabilizing influence to ... the flow of oil to international markets from the Middle East.' Submitted to Vice President Cheney's energy task group, the report recommended that because this was an unacceptable risk to the U.S., 'military intervention' was necessary (Sunday Herald, Oct. 6, 2002)." (The Cheney Gang is the PNAC and they are separate deadly) Errors of Judgment. Meacher reported that "the PNAC blueprint of September 2000 states that the process of transforming the U.S. into 'tomorrow's dominant force' is likely to be a long one in the absence of 'some catastrophic and catalyzing event like a new Pearl Harbor.' " He concluded with the charge that "the 'global war on terrorism' has the hallmarks of a political myth propagated to pave the way for a wholly different agenda the U.S. goal of world hegemony, built around securing by force, command over the oil supplies required to drive the whole project." Important as is the publication of this charge, from Tony Blair's own party in Parliament, to narrow the "Cheney project" to a physiocratic grab for scarce energy supplies fails to grasp the "nature of the beast." (The evangelicals were blind and stupid to have cast their vote for an artificial Christian) Cheney's neo-conservative faction is the modern-day embodiment of the fascist-synarchist forces, that threatened both the Britain and the United States in the 1940s. Pulling his strings are powerful financier forces descendants of those private banking families and financial interests who brought Adolf Hit*ler to power in Germany, and supported Mussolini's dictatorship in Italy. Their aim now, as then, is to establish a world empire that would salvage a crisis-ridden financial system, and eliminate the American humanist-republican tradition associated with Benjamin Franklin, Abraham Lincoln, and Franklin Roosevelt. LaRouche has demonstrated that nine/1*1 was a "Reichstag Fire," allowing for dictatorial measures at home, and for Samuel P. Huntington's Clash of Civilizations pitting Western nations against Islam, and potentially China. The game is much more dangerous than Meacher has described it. But with publication of his article, the "Reichstag Fire" issue & crucially, that of the relation between the Cheney gang's desires and Tony Blair's actions as British Prime Minister is out in the open. (Here is the Pearl Harbor paragraph to compare although not the only one). rense.com From http://thewildwildleft.soapblox.net/showDiary.do?diaryId=380 "Bill Kristol's infamous Project for the New American Century think tank wrote the neoconservative manifesto Rebuilding America's Defenses in September 2000. From it we know that their desire was to increase America's military footprint in the Middle East in order to control the flow of the region's oil. Saddam Hussein was little more than a convenient excuse to establish a strategically superior central base of operations from which they could dominate the region with U.S. by troops. The neocons knew that they'd need something on the order of a "new Pearl Harbor" to get the American public on board with their ambitions, but as things turned out, 9&/*1&1 gave them just the catalyst they needed. We know that they manufactured a case that Hussein had a hand in the 9*/*1*1 attacks and was actively pursing a weapons of mass destruction program, and the mainstream media, most notably the New York Times, helped Dick Cheney's W*hite H*use Iraq Group and Donald Rumsfeld's Office of Special Plans sell it to the American public. We know that then Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld ignored the advice of senior military leaders like Army chief of staff General Eric Shinseki who told him we'd need more troops to make the Iraq invasion successful, he threatened to fire anyone who worked on plans for the post-hostilities phase of operations, and the rest has been a biblical scale blunder. So they started over with Iran. The similarities between the run up to Iraq and the Iran foreplay are haunting: the Office of Special Plans has transformed into the Iranian Directorate, the administration is making wholly unsubstantiated allegations about Iran's arming of Iraqi militia groups and its nuclear intentions, and the mainstream media, most notably again the New York Times, are helping Cheney and his chamberlains sell the narrative to the American public. As historian and journalist Gareth Porter has noted, if the White House opts to attack Iran, it will have once again ignored the cautions of its senior military professionals. It appears that they're about to commit a Ben Franklin-class act of insanity until you stop and recall their original stated objective, which was to establish a larger military footprint in the Middle East. (Yes they see the error of their ways but now it is too late.) By early 2006 it was obvious to all but the Bush administration's most pathological followers that things had gone south in Iraq, and America was running out of patience with U.S. occupation of that country. It was time to come up with a winning strategy before public demand forced a withdrawal. But the possibility of actually winning also had its drawbacks-a "victory" in hand would make it as hard to justify maintaining a troops presence in Iraq as losing did. Hence, when the new National Security Strategy rolled off Mr. Bush's desk in March 2006, it contained the proclamation: "We may face no greater challenge from a single country than from Iran," and the bogey manufacturing commenced. Never mind that biggest "challenge" has an economy about half the size of Mexico's and a defense budget that's only 2.5 percent of its economy. No one has bothered mentioning those factoids, including and especially the New York Times. (If the church had been alive and well its members would of had spiritual discernment- As I've said in the past, truly diabolical strategies can succeed in many ways. The Cheney Gang has marketed the Iranian threat incredibly well. President McCain could have an easy time of maintaining major troop presence in Iraq for a hundred, a thousand, a million years, whatever it takes to contain the Persian Peril. The less obvious outcome of the Iran information campaign is that President Obama may have committed himself to maintaining a force presence in Iraq to counter the Iranian threat as well. (There's 100s of sites) -not to have elected a fraud for President and a gang of weirdo's to govern) The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a spin off of the American Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), recently published a report by its Task Force on the Future of U.S.-Israel relations that says the U.S. and Israel should discuss policy options that include "preventive military action" against Iran. Among the report's signatories were Tony Lake and Susan Rice, two of Barak Obama's key foreign policy advisers. (it comes right down to the translation of his name, America has lost His name) Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes at Pen and Sword . Jeff's novel Bathtub Admirals (Kunati Books), a lampoon on America's rise to global dominance, is on sale now. Tags: Iran, Barak Obama, John McCain, Dick Cheney, George B*u*s*h": Anybody can say God but the power is in His true name as is all wisdom and knowledge. Christ is Yesu and God is Yahweh, the one and only God for which we should pray.